December 29, 2003 Forget about the
Parents
Yet another
federal judge has stricken down a state law requiring parental
notification before a minor can have an abortion. According to this judge,
it didn’t have sufficient protection for the health of the minor. Another
federal judge in another state concluded that it violated the minor’s right
to privacy.
This is crazy. When I went out for high school football, I had to get my
parents to sign a form giving consent. I have an idea that practice still
obtains. So why can a teen age girl get an abortion–manifestly a procedure
with hazards–without parental notification?
There is something truly strange about the privileged position of
abortion in American law.
December 27, 2003
Dean Plays
the Religion Card
Howard Dean has just made his campaign more interesting. He has said he
is going to
talk about Jesus. The initial reaction from some quarters has been,
well, skeptical. Is he merely using religion as a part of his "Southern
Strategy," acknowledging that he can’t win the White House without winning
in the south? Or has he come to the realization that he can’t win as the
most secular of all the candidates?
What makes his announcement odd is that he made it at all. Why announce
that you are going to talk about Jesus. Why not just talk about him? His
initial statements will prove interesting as Christians examine them.
"Christ was someone who sought out people who were disenfranchised,
people who were left behind," Dean told the Boston Globe in Christmas Day
editions. "He fought against self-righteousness of people who had
everything ... He was a person who set an extraordinary example that has
lasted 2,000 years, which is pretty inspiring when you think about it."
Inspiring. When you think about it. Yes, of course, Jesus was a great
man, a great teacher, a great champion of the poor. I suppose Governor Dean
thinks that acknowledging these things makes one a believer in the Jesus of
the Bible. But to believe no more than this about Jesus flies in the face of
logic. As C.S. Lewis said, either Jesus was who he said he was, or his was a
madman, a fraud, or worse. Jesus claimed to have existed from the foundation
of the world. He claimed to be God in the flesh. Will the Governor
acknowledge this? It might well cost him the Moslem vote.
Real Christians may not be that impressed with a man who believes Jesus
was a good man. Real Christians believe he was literally The Son of God with
all that entails. It will be interesting to see how he is questioned on
these issues. For Jesus would have some hard things to say to the leadership
of this country.
December 25, 2003
The End of
the World?
Everyone knows the end of the world is coming. The only questions
left are when and how. Scientists tell us that in 3 to 4 billion years
our sun will blow up and turn our planet into a cinder, so there really
is an end to all this. It doesn’t matter to us whether it 3 billion or 3
million, our end is a lot sooner than that. Even the Bible tells us
there is going to be an end to this "world" this system. It suggests
that if God doesn’t stop us, we will end up destroying ourselves.
But it speaks of time called "the Day of the Lord," when Christ will
return and God’s wrath will descend on disobedient man. There are little
snippets here and there in the New Testament about this time and what it
means for mankind. Paul left at least one early church in a stew over the
question because of the way he spoke of the end times. But when you think
about it, Christ had ascended to the Father with a firm promise that he
would be coming back. There was absolutely no reason for the early church
to think it would be some 2000 years. Read what Paul said to these new
Christians that caused them to react and come to understand why Paul had
to straighten this out in his second letter to them.
Click here to read his
letter.
December 23, 2003
The
Non-Appeaser
Appeasement had a good name in 1938. Nations were still laboring under
the illusion that if they gave, for reasons of state, concessions to the
likes of Adolf Hitler, that they could have peace. There were those who knew
better, but no one was listening at the time.
As an accident of history, or perhaps through a benevolent God working
out some obscure plan, America has a non-appeaser for a president at this
extremely dangerous moment in time. It may be that 9-11 would have knocked
the appeasement out of any president at the time, but that does not seem at
all certain, given the political debates heating up as we approach a
presidential election.
The problem is that evil men do exist, and they can only be dealt with
by superior force. William Safire speaks to the problem this week in the
New York Times:
As American tanks began to roll through Iraq to overthrow Saddam,
Libya's longtime terrorist, Muammar Qaddafi, came up with a strategy to
avoid being next on the regime-change list: pre-emptive surrender.
Nobody calls it that, of course. Diplomats and doves want to treat the
dictator's epiphany as the result of patient negotiation stretching back
for decades. Some Republicans claim he was softened up by a bomb dropped
his way in the Reagan years. But three years after that, his terrorists
murdered 270 people in the bombing of Pan Am 103.
Subsequent sanctions led to economic pain and the threat of a coup.
After acknowledging Libyan responsibility, he has been trying to get U.S.
oil companies back by promising to pay damages to the families of his
victims.
That was not what caused this tyrant suddenly to confess to buying and
developing chemical, biological and nuclear weapons, and to promise to
reveal all to inspectors. He was transformed into a pussycat by the force
of American arms in stopping the spread of mass-destruction weaponry.
Read the remainder on the
NYT editorial page. You have to register, but it’s free.
December 22
Psalm 29
(Psalms 29 KJV) "A Psalm of David.
Give unto the LORD, O ye mighty,
give unto the LORD glory and strength.
{2} Give unto the LORD the glory due unto his name;
worship the LORD in the beauty of holiness.
{3} The voice of the LORD is upon the waters:
the God of glory thundereth:
the LORD is upon many waters.
{4} The voice of the LORD is powerful;
the voice of the LORD is full of majesty.
{5} The voice of the LORD breaketh the cedars;
yea, the LORD breaketh the cedars of Lebanon.
{6} He maketh them also to skip like a calf;
Lebanon and Sirion like a young unicorn.
{7} The voice of the LORD divideth the flames of fire.
{8} The voice of the LORD shaketh the wilderness;
the LORD shaketh the wilderness of Kadesh.
{9} The voice of the LORD maketh the hinds to calve,
and discovereth the forests:
and in his temple doth every one speak of his glory.
{10} The LORD sitteth upon the flood;
yea, the LORD sitteth King for ever.
{11} The LORD will give strength unto his people;
the LORD will bless his people with peace."
This is a late psalm in that it mentions the temple. That being the case
the author may never have heard the voice of Jehovah himself, but the
legends of that voice must have formed a powerful image in the minds of all
the people. When God came down on Mount Sinai, the whole mountain shook and
started to smoke. And when God spoke the words of the Ten commandments, his
voice rolling down the sides of the mountain and echoing into the distance,
it must have been enough to loosen a man’s insides. It was powerful enough
to break huge trees.
That last idea in the psalm, that Jehovah will give strength to his
people is interesting in that it doesn’t specify Israel. "The People of God"
seems to include more than a few tribes. In the time of Paul, there were
many non-Jews who believed in God and rejected all idols. They had not gone
so far as to be circumcised and to keep all the rituals of Judaism, but they
did keep the commandments of God. They were called "God Fearers" by the
Jews. Most likely, this is who God was talking about when he told Paul in a
dream, " Be not afraid, but speak, and hold not thy peace: For I am with
thee, and no man shall set on thee to hurt thee: for I have much people in
this city." (Acts 18:9-10).
They may also be the "other sheep" Jesus mentioned, "And other sheep I
have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they
shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd."
(John 10:16)
December 20, 2003
Fort Taliban?
The new US Commander in Afghanistan is planning a new approach to
reconstruction. He plans to establish "bases to provide
reconstruction aid in provinces plagued by Taliban attacks." It is a
fascinating development with its roots in the old Wild West. In days when
Indian raids made it dangerous all over the West, the Army established a
network of forts, secure areas from which the cavalry could dominate an
are and provide security for settlers. Old ideas can sometimes work again.
Read the article
here.
December 12, 2003
Courage
{13} I had fainted, unless I had believed
to see the goodness of the LORD in the land of the living.
{14} Wait on the LORD:
be of good courage,
and he shall strengthen thine heart:
wait, I say, on the LORD." (Psalm 27)
"Be of good courage" may not speak so much to the way you feel as to
what you do. Even the bravest men in battle know fear. But they fight as
though they were not afraid. That is what courage is all about–overcoming
the fear, not denying it.
There is a corollary to faith. Faith does not involve knowing with
certainty. If one knows, faith is not needed. Rather faith is deciding to
trust even in the absence of certainty. It has more to do with what you do
than with what you feel.
December 11, 2003
Hillary
for President?
Robert Novak is a savvy insider with connections that go nearly
everywhere. Important people will return his calls. And when he tells us
that Democrats are getting worried about Howard Dean and where he will take
the party, you can believe that Democrats are getting worried. The problem
is, if Dean wins on the first ballot at the Democratic convention, it’s all
over. What Democratic politicians will now try to do is prevent Dean from
winning that first ballot. He will come into the convention ahead, but
perhaps without a clear majority.
The problem with Dean among Democrats is not so much his policy, but his
"loose lips." He has a habit of shooting from the hip and making goofy
statements. I expect the Republican National Committee has enough film clips
of these to make some pretty entertaining campaign ads.
One thing, though. The Democratic convention next year will not be nearly
as boring as it has been. Stay tuned.
December 2, 2003
Democrats Boxed
In?
I think it was Rush Limbaugh who said the Democrats start getting crazy
when they are out of power (or was it the other way around?). Whatever the
case,
Joe Klein this week opines that: "We have reached a moment of
transcendent weirdness in American politics and perhaps a defining moment in
the 2004 presidential campaign." I was wondering if I was the only one who
noticed. The parties seem almost to have switched sides on a whole range of
issues that they used to stand on. The Republicans are spending like drunken
sailors and the Democrats are calling for fiscal restraint. Is it my
imagination, or wasn’t it the other way around, say, 20 years ago?
It is fairly clear what is going on, though. Bill Clinton moved to the
center to get elected, and GWB is doing exactly the same thing. Only Bush is
going for bigger stakes than that. He wants a strongly republican congress as
well. Look at the present round of Republican spending as an investment in
the next set of Supreme Court justices. Believe it or not, that is a much
bigger issue than either medicare or energy.
Bush is making two huge gambles and is staking his presidency on them for
what he perceives to be the good of the country. One is the move to plant
democracy in the middle east. The other is do whatever the voter want so he
can move the courts to the right in his second term. The stakes are higher
than most people realize, on the one side for our security, on the other for
our history.
There is a big year ahead in politics. Klein: "The Bush Administration is
outsmarting the Democrats at every turn. The economy seems to be recovering.
If Iraq is stabilized—a huge if—what will the Democrats run on? Their
intellectual cupboard is bare, and the election may be slipping away."
Do Real Men Teach?
An Essay by Richard Kisel
|