14
On Being Perfect
Be ye therefore perfect,
even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect
(Matthew 5:48).
The call for perfection that Jesus included in the Sermon on the
Mount seems to ask the impossible of us. How on earth can any man
ever achieve perfection? One explanation is that perfection is the
goal, and we will reach it only in the resurrection. We strive for
perfection in this life, but there is no way we can achieve it in the
flesh. But if that is what Jesus meant, there were many ways he could
have said precisely that.
There is an odd thing about this passage. Jesus did not actually
say, “Be you perfect.” Jesus, of course, spoke these words in Aramaic
and Matthew rendered them in Greek. What has come down to us is
this statement: “Be ye therefore teleios, even as your Father which is
in heaven is teleios.” With all the wonderful Bible study programs
now available, anyone can consult a Greek lexicon and do his own
word search. The definition of telios in the lexicon is “complete.”
You can do a word study through the New Testament to see how the
word is used, and you will find that “complete” works in every
instance. Jesus said, “Be you therefore complete.” And there is a
world of difference between “complete” and “perfect.” The word
“perfect” is defined as “being entirely without fault or defect.” I am
sure that is an accurate description of God. I am equally sure that it is
an utterly inaccurate description of any man or woman alive.
“Complete” is a different idea entirely. I am a private pilot with
instrument, glider, and multi-engine ratings. When I completed my
instruction for the last rating, my instructor signed me off, shook my
hand, and said, “Congratulations. Now you are a complete pilot.” I
didn’t know exactly what he meant, because no one knew better than
I how far I was from perfect. I think he meant that I now had a full set
of the ratings available for a private pilot. Of course, the fact is that
there is no such thing as a perfect pilot. There are simply too many
variables that can arise in that complicated pursuit for anyone ever to
claim perfection. In a way, it is a nice analogy with life.
One of the biggest problems we face when tackling a subject like
this is getting our semantics right. What do we mean by the words we
use? For most of us, the definition of “perfect” I offered above is
perfectly accurate. Now I have to explain where “perfect” misses the
sense of what Jesus intended to say.
Imagine a pianist in recital, performing a difficult Chopin etude.
It is possible for him to do a flawless performance, getting all the
notes right, using the pedal as indicated on the page, following the
instructions for loudness and softness. I have heard people, listening
to such a performance in recital, comment on its perfection saying
that he “didn’t miss a single note,” (a high compliment for a novice).
They were defining the performance in terms of what did not happen.
There were no errors.
Can we agree that it is possible to do a perfect, flawless
performance, and yet have a performance that is mediocre and
uninspired? You can have a flawless piano solo by one pianist, and
a performance of the same piece by a genius, and even the untrained
ear can hear the difference. Perfection and excellence are two entirely
different things. Once again, we fall back on the meaning of words.
Excellent means “eminently good, first-class.” Perfection means
“being entirely without fault or defect.”
It dawned on me out of the blue one day that the idea of
perfection is a negative idea. It is negative in that it defines a thing in
negative terms. The thing does not have fault. It does not have a
defect or blemish. All perfection describes is what is not there. It says
little about what is there.
Once the idea had taken root, I had to find out more, so I headed
off to the Internet where you can find out anything about everything
(or is it everything about anything?). The word I chose to search for
was “perfectionism.” I found two starkly opposing views on the
subject. One held that perfectionism is a good thing if it’s managed
properly. That view acknowledges that the perfectionist can be
neurotic, but by and large, it’s a good thing.
The other held that perfectionism is entirely a neurotic condition
and is harmful. The difference between these views is superficial and
arises from semantics, but it is instructive, nonetheless. I found a
helpful paper on the Web by Dr. Carol Peters which outlines the
various ways of approaching the subject. It seems that scholars in the
field describe two types of perfectionist—the normal and the neurotic.
Normal perfectionists are people who derive real pleasure from
painstaking work. Neurotic perfectionists are those who are unable to
find any satisfaction because, in their own eyes, nothing they do is
ever good enough.
So Carol Peters is persuaded that perfectionism can be good or
bad, it all depends. But she also notes that, “A number of researchers
. . . have linked perfectionism with depression, anorexia nervosa,
bulimia, migraine, personality and psychosomatic disorders, Type A
coronary-prone behaviour and suicide.” Is it a good thing? Or is it
harmful?
Peters cites another author who lists five characteristics of
perfectionist teachers and students:
1. Procrastination.
2. Fear of failure.
3. The all-or-nothing mindset.
4. Paralysed perfectionism.
5. Workaholism.
These characteristics are said to contribute to underachievement.
Procrastination affects all of us from time to time. The fear of being
less than perfect, of not living up to one’s own expectations, can
produce overwhelming feelings that lead us to put things off. I don’t
think many of us consciously go through this line of thought, but the
fear of making a mistake, of having a fault, can prevent us from
starting a project in the first place. This probably lies near the root of
what we call “writer’s block.” Successful writers have come to
understand that the blank page has to be assaulted with words, so they
just start writing. They can always come back and rewrite. It is a
curious thing that most drafts of papers, books, or novels, can be
improved merely by cutting off the first few paragraphs. Once the
block is passed, the work gets better.
Putting things off until the last minute, when a deadline is bearing
down, is called procrastination. It makes life harder on everyone
connected with a project. But some people cannot bring themselves
to start until they absolutely must.
Apathy also keeps the writer from starting, but that may be merely
another manifestation of perfectionism. He knows his work will never
measure up, so he just never starts. And thus, never has to face the
lack of perfection.
I recall a sermon I gave years ago in England. It was one of those
fire and brimstone sermons that people strangely seem to enjoy
(mostly, I think, because they are sure I am talking about someone
else). After the sermon, and after the usual round of congratulations,
which I always take with a grain of salt, a gentleman came to me and
said something that shook me to my roots.
“My, Mr. Dart,” he said, “when you preach like that, I just feel
like I am never going to make it.” He meant it as a compliment, but
it woke me up to one of the major errors of young preachers. The last
thing I wanted was to make people feel like they could never make it.
I have thought about this encounter a great deal, and I have come
to see it in an entirely new light. When you hold up unrealistically
high standards for people, the end result is likely to be apathy. When
a man comes to feel that he “can’t make it,” the natural response is
“Why try? I can never measure up to this standard. I can never do this
without making a mistake. I can never reach the faultless plateau, I
am too flawed, I just can’t reach this level. I might as well give up.”
Those perfectionists who can’t live with apathy tend to become
workaholic. According to Peters, they are “dependent on performance
since self-esteem is tied to external rewards.” Too often, it is tied to
how we think others look at us. We can’t find satisfaction inside
ourselves.
Workaholics don’t delegate well, because no one can achieve
their high expectations—not even themselves. They also have a hard
time saying “no” and get over-committed, losing any sense of balance
in their lives. Sometimes people don’t like letting go of something
because they are afraid of failure on the part of the person to whom
they have delegated the job. Perfectionists have a hard time allowing
someone else do the job and then accepting the job when it is
finished. Sometimes the person performing the job simply cannot do
the job as well as the perfectionist would like.
So we are left with a person who either cannot delegate, or having
delegated cannot let go. A person who can’t say no, because, “If I
don’t do it, who will?” or “Nobody can do it the way I think it ought
to be done.” This hardly seems to be what Jesus was advocating in the
Sermon on the Mount. But there is another side to the story.
At the end of our Internet search, we find one theorist telling us
that perfectionism is a neurosis and another telling us that it is not.
Now how can this be? The answer? Semantics. Read this paragraph
carefully:
Students can be helped to cope with perfectionism by
accepting it as a basic part of their giftedness, by emphasizing
its positive aspects, and by acknowledging the anxiety and
frustration it provokes (Silverman, 1995, p. 4). Difficult
challenges generate anxieties which require inner strength and
a great deal of persistence to overcome. Gifted learners need
support to persist despite constant awareness of failure.
Excellence takes more time and hard work than mediocrity.
(Emphasis mine.)
Did you catch it? The author switched words on us in mid stride.
What is he talking about, excellence or perfectionism? The author
uses these words interchangeably, but they don’t mean the same
thing. Excellence transcends perfection. Excellence can be imperfect,
even flawed. Excellence may not be exactly what is written in the
score of a piece of music. It is possible, after all, to improve on Bach.
A story is told of an organist in a German cathedral who, one day,
encountered a stranger who was examining his organ. Learning that
the visitor was also an organist, he proposed that they play together.
The cathedral had two organs, so there began a kind of contest,
dueling organs, if you will. Each would propose a theme which would
be answered by the other. Step by step, they ascended into ever more
complex themes and variations. Finally, the visitor proposed a theme
that the other could not answer. The organist walked over to the
stranger and said, “Either you are an angel from heaven, or you are
Johann Sebastian Bach.” Bach was a genius at the organ, they say, a
greater performer than he was a composer. Genius transcends
perfectionism, it goes beyond the music that is on the page. Yet
genius may be flawed. So we have to be sure we know what is at
issue here. Is it excellence, or perfection?
And it is here that a major issue can be addressed in Christian
theology and Christian conduct. Excellence can be flawed. One can
be complete without being perfect. This is true even when it comes
to the Law of God.
Peters had this good advice: “Maintain high standards for yourself
but don't impose them on others—they will run the other way fast!”
Then she adds this admonition: “Maintain high standards for yourself,
but don't impose them on others lest you become a tyrant.”
That last sentence underscores what too many Christians have had
to endure. I recall preaching sermons when I was younger in which I
held up a standard so high, that no one could hope to measure up to
it—certainly I could not. I was asking the congregation to be, well,
perfect. I think not a few preachers become tyrants because they are
perfectionists and they are demanding things of the people that they
themselves cannot measure up to. Not only that, their standards and
God’s standards may not be the same. Imagine how terrible this can
become if the preacher creates an organization that thinks it must
enforce his standards. This is the stuff that cults are made of.
God’s standards (and you can always count on this) are
administered with grace. Men’s standards, unfortunately, are too often
not. And that is precisely where the divide came between the disciples
of Jesus and those of the Pharisees.
In my research, I happened on a publication of the University of
Illinois counseling center. I presume it was a kind of pamphlet for
incoming students and was attempting to help them adjust to
university life. They offered this warning about perfectionism.
Perfectionism refers to a set of self-defeating thoughts and
behaviors aimed at reaching excessively high unrealistic
goals. Perfectionism is often mistakenly seen in our society as
desirable or even necessary for success. However, recent
studies have shown that perfectionistic attitudes actually
interfere with success. The desire to be perfect can both rob
you of a sense of personal satisfaction and cause you to fail to
achieve as much as people who have more realistic strivings.
I can see a Christian reading that and balking. After all, Jesus said
we should be perfect, and they are telling us that perfectionistic
attitudes can actually interfere with success. But that wasn’t what
Jesus was saying. He was calling on man to be complete, to strive for
excellence. And the person who is striving for excellence will almost
always surpass the one who is striving for mere perfection.
Many years ago, I was teaching public speaking at a small college
in England. All speeches were evaluated and given a critique. It was
my custom to allow the students to evaluate one another which, at
times, got downright brutal. But the student evaluators focused on
eradicating faults, errors, and mistakes. Unfortunately the poor rascal
who had given the speech was often bombarded with a barrage of
trivial imperfections. It took some work to get the students to give
attention to the really important things. Did you understand what the
speaker was saying? Were you persuaded by his arguments? Did he
move you to do something about his issue?
It is a point often overlooked, but if you spend your lifetime
working on your weaknesses, your faults, your mistakes, the best you
can ever hope for is mediocrity. How do you transcend that? You
work on your strong points. You work on making your gifts and
talents stronger. If you are a teacher, you look at what a student does
well, and you try to lift it to the point of excellence. In that way, you
have a chance to take a young person far beyond what he thought he
could do. He has a chance of excellence that the pursuit of mere
perfection would deny him.
There is an unexpected benefit of this approach. A person’s faults
and weaknesses get drawn up into the striving for excellence, and
they often as not take care of themselves. I am talking in the context
of teaching speech, but it applies in every aspect of life. If, when
working with your children, all you do is work on faults, weaknesses
and mistakes, your kids are likely to grow up to be, at best, mediocre
performers. At the worst, they may end up neurotic perfectionists.
But, when working with anyone, children, employees, students,
wife, husband, your question should be, “What does he do well?”
What are the strengths? How do you make them better and stronger
so that the strengths, the things a person is really good at, sweep up
and carry along the mistakes and faults?
The University of Illinois pamphlet continued:
If you are a perfectionist, it is likely that you learned early in
life that other people valued you because of how much you
accomplished or achieved. As a result you may have learned
to value yourself only on the basis of other people's approval.
Thus your self-esteem may have come to be based primarily
on external standards. This can leave you vulnerable and
excessively sensitive to the opinions and criticism of others.
In attempting to protect yourself from such criticism, you may
decide that being perfect is your only defense.
As a counselor, I encounter people in that situation. They value
themselves entirely on the basis of the approval of others, never
realizing that being perfect will only get them more criticism. You
will not avoid criticism by being perfect. You will only get more of
it.
Perfectionists tend to anticipate or fear disapproval and
rejection from those around them. Given such fear,
perfectionists may react defensively to criticism and in doing
so frustrate and alienate others.
Sooner or later in life you must learn to avoid being defensive
about criticism. The more successful you are, the more criticism you
will receive. I have a wastebasket under my desk , and whenever I
read a letter that is harshly critical and lacking in constructive ideas,
I rarely get beyond the first two paragraphs. From long experience, I
can recognize hostility quickly, and the letter goes to the waste
basket. I once had a friend who, when he got one of those letters,
would systematically tear it up. I don’t even give the letter that much
attention. Critical emails should get the same treatment. It is even
how we should handle destructive conversations. If all a person can
do is find fault, they are telling you that you aren’t perfect. But you
already know that, so listening is a waste of time.
Without realizing it, perfectionists may also apply their
unrealistically high standards to others, becoming critical and
demanding of them. Furthermore, perfectionists may avoid
letting others see their mistakes, not realizing that self-disclosure allows others to perceive them as more human and
thus more likeable. Because of this vicious cycle
perfectionists often have difficulty being close to people and
therefore have less than satisfactory interpersonal relation-ships.
I told you all this to explain what Jesus meant when he told us to
be “perfect as our Father in heaven is perfect.” Perfectionism can be
defined as an excessive striving to be without fault or defect. This is
not to say that we shouldn’t try to overcome our faults or defects. But
there is an obsessive striving that is unhealthy. Perfectionism, then,
is negative because it defines what is not there rather than what is.
And when it comes to the Law of God, that is not good enough, as
Jesus explained in the Sermon on the Mount.
I have often heard it said that no one can keep the law perfectly.
The statement is entirely true, and completely irrelevant. The law is
not given to define perfection. It is given as a guide to life. The
purpose of the law is stated quite simply by the psalmist: “Your word
is a lamp to my feet And a light to my path” (Psalm 119:105). It is
there so we won’t fall down and hurt ourselves.
|